Renault Grand Espace 2010 vs Ford Galaxy 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 175 HP | 115 - 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 - 360 NM | 185 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 - 12.4 seconds | 8.8 - 13.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 8.8 | 5.7 - 8.2 | |
|
Renault Grand Espace petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Galaxy. On average, Renault Grand Espace equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Grand Espace is 4 cm longer than the Ford Galaxy, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Grand Espace is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3050 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Grand Espace has more luggage capacity. Renault Grand Espace has 66 litres more trunk space than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Espace is 0.5 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Renault Grand Espace can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`598 | ~ 2`486 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Espace has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |