Renault Grand Espace 2012 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 - 175 HP | 140 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 - 360 NM | 240 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 - 12.4 seconds | 8.3 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 8.5 | 5.5 - 8.4 | |
|
Renault Grand Espace petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Sharan. On average, Renault Grand Espace equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.74 m | |
| Renault Grand Espace and Volkswagen Sharan are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 809 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3050 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan has more luggage space. Renault Grand Espace has 353 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Grand Espace is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`622 | ~ 2`337 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Grand Espace has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |