Renault Espace 1997 vs Volkswagen Sharan 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Renault Espace is available only with front wheel drive, while Volkswagen Sharan can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.9 - 3.0 | 1.8 - 2.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 - 194 HP | 90 - 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 168 - 267 NM | 170 - 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 - 15 seconds | 11.8 - 19.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 - 13.7 | 6.5 - 13.6 | |
|
Renault Espace petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Sharan. On average, Renault Espace equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.73 m | |
| Renault Espace is 10 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Espace is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 275 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2850 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Espace is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`363 | ~ 1`940 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Espace has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |