Renault Clio 2003 vs Renault Clio 2003

 
Renault Clio
2003 - 2005
Renault Clio
2003 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Diesel1.5 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 80 HP65 HP
Torque: 185 NM160 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.2 seconds15 seconds
Renault Clio 2003 is more dynamic to drive.
Renault Clio 2003 engine produces 15 HP more power than Renault Clio 2003, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Renault Clio 2003. Thanks to more power Renault Clio 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.24.3
Real fuel consumption: 4.7 l/100km4.9 l/100km
By specification Renault Clio 2003 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio 2003, which means that by driving the Renault Clio 2003 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio 2003 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio 2003.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1190 km in combined cycle1160 km in combined cycle
1420 km on highway1350 km on highway
1060 km with real consumption1020 km with real consumption

Engines

Engine production duration: 4 years4 years

Dimensions

Length: 3.81 m3.81 m
Width: 1.64 m1.64 m
Height: 1.42 m1.42 m
Both cars are similar in size. Renault Clio 2003 and Renault Clio 2003 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 255 litres255 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1037 litres1037 litres
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters10.3 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`5151`515
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 12001200
Rating in user reviews: 5.0/10 5.0/10
Pros and Cons: Renault Clio has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv