Renault Clio 2006 vs Hyundai Getz 2005
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 197 HP | 106 HP | |
Torque: | 215 NM | 144 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 91 HP more power than Hyundai Getz, whereas torque is 71 NM more than Hyundai Getz. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 6.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
The Hyundai Getz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Getz, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 345 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Getz. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
840 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
580 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
Hyundai Getz gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 26 years | 12 years | |
Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO, Kia Cerato | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.99 m | 3.82 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.66 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.49 m | |
Renault Clio is larger, but slightly lower. Renault Clio is 17 cm longer than the Hyundai Getz, 11 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 254 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1038 litres | 977 litres | |
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Renault Clio has 34 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Getz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 61 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 1 metres more than that of the Hyundai Getz, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`690 | 1`530 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | below average | |
Hyundai Getz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Hyundai Getz, so Hyundai Getz quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1600 | 1200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 6.1/10 | 7.8/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Hyundai Getz has
| |