Renault Clio 2005 vs Toyota Aygo 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 HP | 55 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 130 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 16.8 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 31 HP more power than Toyota Aygo, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Toyota Aygo. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 4.7 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 3.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Renault Clio is larger. Renault Clio is 58 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 9 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | 751 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Renault Clio has 149 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 284 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 1.3 metres more than that of the Toyota Aygo, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`245 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Toyota Aygo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Toyota Aygo, so Toyota Aygo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |