Renault Clio 2005 vs Hyundai Getz 2005
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 68 HP | 88 HP | |
Torque: | 160 NM | 215 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.2 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
Hyundai Getz is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 20 HP less power than Hyundai Getz, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Hyundai Getz. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
The Renault Clio is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Getz, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Clio consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Getz. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1080 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
940 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.99 m | 3.82 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.66 m | |
Height: | 1.49 m | 1.49 m | |
Renault Clio is larger. Renault Clio is 17 cm longer than the Hyundai Getz, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 254 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | 977 litres | |
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Renault Clio has 34 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Getz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 58 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.7 metres more than that of the Hyundai Getz, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`575 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | below average | |
Hyundai Getz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Hyundai Getz, so Hyundai Getz quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1600 | 1200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 6.1/10 | 7.8/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Hyundai Getz has
| |