Renault Clio 2006 vs Hyundai Getz 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 97 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 1 HP more power than Hyundai Getz, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Hyundai Getz. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Getz, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Clio consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Getz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Renault Modus | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 1 cm shorter than the Hyundai Getz, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 254 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | 977 litres | |
| Renault Clio has 1 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Getz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 58 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.3 metres more than that of the Hyundai Getz. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`525 | 1`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Hyundai Getz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Hyundai Getz, so Hyundai Getz quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.1/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Hyundai Getz has
| |