Renault Clio 2005 vs Toyota Aygo 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
|
Toyota Aygo is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 3 HP less power than Toyota Aygo, but torque is 12 NM more than Toyota Aygo. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 3.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 315 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 3.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Renault Clio is larger. Renault Clio is 58 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 9 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | 751 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Renault Clio has 149 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 284 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.9 metres more than that of the Toyota Aygo, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Toyota Aygo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Toyota Aygo, so Toyota Aygo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |