Renault Clio 2009 vs Toyota Auris 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Toyota Auris is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 5 HP less power than Toyota Auris, but torque is 30 NM more than Toyota Auris. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.5 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Auris, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Auris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 1010 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 22 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Yaris, Toyota iQ | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 19 cm shorter than the Toyota Auris, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1355 litres | |
|
Toyota Auris has more luggage space. Renault Clio has 66 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Auris. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.3 metres more than that of the Toyota Auris. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`655 | 1`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Toyota Auris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Toyota Auris, so Toyota Auris quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Toyota Auris has
| |