Renault Clio 2008 vs Peugeot 207 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 73 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 2 HP more power than Peugeot 207, but torque is 13 NM less than Peugeot 207. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 207, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 207. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 870 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo, Renault Twingo, Dacia Sandero | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Citroen C2, Peugeot Bipper | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.15 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.53 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Clio is 5 cm longer than the Peugeot 207, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 337 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1258 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Renault Clio has 102 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 207. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.8 metres less than that of the Peugeot 207, which means Renault Clio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`595 | 1`642 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Renault Clio has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Peugeot 207, so Renault Clio quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Peugeot 207 has
| |