Renault Clio 2008 vs Chevrolet Aveo 2007
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 84 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 NM | 114 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 9 HP less power than Chevrolet Aveo, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Chevrolet Aveo. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Clio consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 870 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo, Renault Twingo, Dacia Sandero | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.31 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.50 m | |
| Renault Clio is 11 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Aveo, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Clio is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 375 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Clio has 64 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Aveo. The Chevrolet Aveo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`595 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Chevrolet Aveo has
| |