Renault Clio 2009 vs Renault Scenic 2004
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 151 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 14.3 seconds | |
| Renault Clio engine produces 5 HP less power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Renault Scenic. Despite less power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Clio consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 25 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 3 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1840 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Renault Clio has 9 litres more trunk space than the Renault Scenic. The Renault Scenic may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`705 | 1`950 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 155 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |