Renault Clio 2009 vs Skoda Fabia 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 5 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 4.9 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Clio consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 1010 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.50 m | |
| Renault Clio is 1 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 7 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1226 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Renault Clio has 41 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.3 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`690 | 1`665 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |