Renault Clio 2009 vs Skoda Roomster 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Skoda Roomster is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 20 HP less power than Skoda Roomster, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Skoda Roomster. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 1010 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Renault Clio is larger, but lower. Renault Clio is 1 cm longer than the Skoda Roomster, 2 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 480 litres | |
|
Skoda Roomster has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Renault Clio has 41 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Roomster. This could mean that the Renault Clio uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.2 metres less than that of the Skoda Roomster. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`690 | 1`777 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Roomster has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Skoda Roomster has
| |