Renault Clio 2009 vs Renault Scenic 2003
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 15.7 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 5 HP more power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Renault Scenic. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 1010 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Clio, Nissan Almera, Nissan Micra, Suzuki Jimny | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 3 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1840 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Renault Clio has 9 litres more trunk space than the Renault Scenic. The Renault Scenic may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.4 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`690 | 1`920 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 400 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |