Renault Clio 2009 vs Dacia Logan 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
| Renault Clio engine produces 5 HP less power than Dacia Logan, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Dacia Logan. Despite less power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 7.5 | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Clio consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Renault Twingo, Renault Modus | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Nissan Almera, Renault Kangoo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Logan might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 24 cm shorter than the Dacia Logan, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 700 litres | |
|
Dacia Logan has more luggage space. Renault Clio has 261 litres less trunk space than the Dacia Logan. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.5 metres less than that of the Dacia Logan, which means Renault Clio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`608 | 1`770 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Logan has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Dacia Logan has
| |