Renault Clio 2000 vs Ford Fiesta 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
| Renault Clio engine produces 8 HP more power than Ford Fiesta, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Ford Fiesta. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 40 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.77 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.63 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.32 m | |
| Renault Clio is 6 cm shorter than the Ford Fiesta, 1 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | 930 litres | |
| Renault Clio has 5 litres more trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 105 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Fiesta, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Renault Clio has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Fiesta, so Renault Clio quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
| |