Renault Clio 2000 vs Peugeot 106 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 111 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 17 seconds | |
| Renault Clio engine produces 23 HP more power than Peugeot 106, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Peugeot 106. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.77 m | 3.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.59 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Renault Clio is larger. Renault Clio is 9 cm longer than the Peugeot 106, 5 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | 953 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Renault Clio has 40 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 106. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 82 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.3 metres less than that of the Peugeot 106. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`315 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Peugeot 106 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Peugeot 106, so Peugeot 106 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Peugeot 106 has
| |