Renault Clio 1998 vs Mazda 121 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 110 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Mazda 121 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 15 HP less power than Mazda 121, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Mazda 121. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 121, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 121. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 710 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.77 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.63 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.32 m | |
| Renault Clio is 6 cm shorter than the Mazda 121, 1 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | no data | |
| Renault Clio has 5 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 121. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 121, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`420 | 1`435 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Mazda 121 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mazda 121, so Mazda 121 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Mazda 121 has
| |