Renault Clio 2002 vs Dacia Logan 2008
Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 80 HP | 70 HP | |
Torque: | 185 NM | 160 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 15 seconds | |
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 10 HP more power than Dacia Logan, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Dacia Logan. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 4.6 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1190 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
1350 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
1080 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 4 years | 5 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Nissan Almera, Nissan Micra, Suzuki Jimny | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Clio, Renault Megane, Nissan Note | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Logan might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.81 m | 4.29 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.52 m | |
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 48 cm shorter than the Dacia Logan, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 10 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 510 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.2 metres less than that of the Dacia Logan. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`540 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | Dacia Logan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 155 percent more cases than Dacia Logan, so Dacia Logan quality is probably significantly better | ||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Dacia Logan has
| |