Renault Clio 2001 vs Toyota Yaris 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 86 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 12 HP more power than Toyota Yaris, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Toyota Yaris. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Yaris is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Renault Modus | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.50 m | |
| Renault Clio is 20 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.5 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`475 | 900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Toyota Yaris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Toyota Yaris, so Toyota Yaris quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |