Renault Clio 2003 vs Citroen C2 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 23 HP more power than Citroen C2, whereas torque is 9 NM more than Citroen C2. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
| Renault Clio is 14 cm longer than the Citroen C2, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 193 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | 879 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Renault Clio has 62 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 156 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.7 metres more than that of the Citroen C2, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`495 | 1`365 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Citroen C2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Citroen C2, so Citroen C2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Citroen C2 has
| |