Renault Clio 2006 vs Renault Clio 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 194 NM | 151 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio 2006 is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio 2006 engine produces 30 HP more power than Renault Clio 2008, whereas torque is 43 NM more than Renault Clio 2008. Thanks to more power Renault Clio 2006 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio 2006 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio 2008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio 2006 could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio 2006 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio 2008. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Renault Koleos | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio 2008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | no data | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`675 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Renault Clio has
| |