Renault Clio 2005 vs Renault Modus 2004
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 113 HP | |
| Torque: | 151 NM | 151 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Renault Modus is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 1 HP less power than Renault Modus, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Modus, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Modus. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 49 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 25 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 3.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Renault Clio is larger, but lower. Renault Clio is 20 cm longer than the Renault Modus, 1 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 274 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | 1283 litres | |
| Renault Clio has 14 litres more trunk space than the Renault Modus. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Modus (by 248 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Modus, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`660 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Renault Modus has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Renault Modus, so Renault Modus quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Renault Modus has
| |