Renault Clio 2008 vs Seat Ibiza 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 151 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Seat Ibiza is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 5 HP more power than Seat Ibiza, but torque is 2 NM less than Seat Ibiza. Despite the higher power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | no data | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.45 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 292 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 938 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`571 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Seat Ibiza has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Seat Ibiza, so Seat Ibiza quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Seat Ibiza has
| |