Renault Clio 2009 vs Skoda Fabia 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 20 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.2 | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Clio consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Renault Clio is larger, but slightly lower. Renault Clio is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 7 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.7 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`665 | 1`674 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |