Renault Clio 2008 vs Skoda Fabia 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 86 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 126 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 14 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 1 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 790 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | no data | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.50 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 300 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`590 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |