Renault Clio 2012 vs Skoda Scala 2019
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 200 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
Skoda Scala is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 25 HP less power than Skoda Scala, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Skoda Scala. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.2 | 4.1 | |
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Clio consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Scala, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1400 km in combined cycle | 1210 km in combined cycle | |
1500 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.06 m | 4.36 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 30 cm shorter than the Skoda Scala, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 467 litres | |
Skoda Scala has more luggage space. Renault Clio has 167 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Scala. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.3 metres less than that of the Skoda Scala. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`658 | 1`774 | |
Safety: | |||
The Renault Clio scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 9800 | 17 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Skoda Scala has
| |