Renault Clio 2003 vs Renault Clio 2003

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Renault Clio
2003 - 2005
Renault Clio
2003 - 2005
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Renault Clio 2003 is available with front wheel drive and rear wheel drive, while Renault Clio 2003 can be equipped only with front wheel drive.
Engines: 1.1 - 2.91.1 - 1.6

Performance

Power: 60 - 255 HP60 - 110 HP
Torque: 93 - 300 NM93 - 200 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.8 - 15 seconds9.6 - 15 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.2 - 11.94.2 - 7.4
Renault Clio 2003 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio 2003. On average, a Renault Clio 2003 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Renault Clio 2003.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.81 m3.81 m
Width: 1.66 m1.64 m
Height: 1.42 m1.42 m
Both cars are similar in size. Renault Clio 2003 and Renault Clio 2003 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 255 litres255 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1037 litres1037 litres
Turning diameter: 13 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Clio 2003 is 2.3 metres more than that of the Renault Clio 2003, which means Renault Clio 2003 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`499~ 1`501
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

below average
Average price (€): 12001200
Rating in user reviews: 5.0/10 5.0/10
Pros and Cons:
    Renault Clio has
    • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
    • better manoeuvrability
    • fewer faults
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv