Renault Clio 2005 vs Toyota Aygo 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 | 1.0 - 1.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 197 HP | 55 - 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 - 240 NM | 93 - 130 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 15.2 seconds | 14.2 - 16.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 8.4 | 3.8 - 4.2 | |
|
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Aygo. On average, Renault Clio equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.94 m | 3.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Renault Clio is larger. Renault Clio is 53 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 7 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1038 litres | 751 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Renault Clio has 149 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 287 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 1.9 metres more than that of the Toyota Aygo, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`653 | ~ 1`188 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |