Renault Clio 2008 vs Skoda Fabia 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Renault Clio is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Skoda Fabia has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.6 (petrol) | 1.2 - 1.9 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 112 HP | 60 - 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 - 151 NM | 108 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 - 14 seconds | 10.4 - 16.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 6.7 | 4.8 - 7.5 | |
|
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Skoda Fabia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.50 m | |
| Renault Clio is 4 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 7 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1485 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Renault Clio has 41 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.7 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`630 | ~ 1`626 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |