Renault Clio 2009 vs Renault Scenic 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.6 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 128 HP | 80 - 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 - 220 NM | 127 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 13.6 seconds | 8.6 - 15.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 7.5 | 5.0 - 8.6 | |
|
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Scenic. On average, Renault Clio equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 3 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1840 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Renault Clio has 9 litres more trunk space than the Renault Scenic. The Renault Scenic may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`653 | ~ 1`955 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |