Renault Clio 2009 vs Nissan Micra 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | 1.2 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 128 HP | 80 - 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 - 220 NM | 110 - 142 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 13.6 seconds | 11.3 - 14.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 7.5 | 4.1 - 5.4 | |
|
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Micra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 3.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Renault Clio is larger, but slightly lower. Renault Clio is 45 cm longer than the Nissan Micra, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 265 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1132 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Renault Clio has 174 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Micra. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 9.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 1.4 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`653 | ~ 1`454 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |