Renault Clio 2013 vs Renault Megane 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Renault Clio is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Renault Megane has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 0.9 - 1.5 | 1.2 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 95 - 220 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 - 220 NM | 151 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 - 12.2 seconds | 7.6 - 12.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.2 - 4.5 | 3.5 - 7.3 | |
|
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Megane. On average, Renault Clio equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 30 cm shorter than the Renault Megane, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 443 litres | 524 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1595 litres | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage space. Renault Clio has 81 litres less trunk space than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.5 metres less than that of the Renault Megane, which means Renault Clio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`676 | ~ 1`866 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Renault Megane has
| |