Renault Clio 1998 vs Volkswagen Polo 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.9 | 1.0 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 110 HP | 50 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 - 160 NM | 86 - 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 15.4 seconds | 8.7 - 18.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 7.6 | 4.4 - 7.5 | |
|
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. On average, Renault Clio equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.77 m | 3.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.63 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Clio is 3 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | 975 litres | |
| Renault Clio has 10 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 60 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`498 | ~ 1`416 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |