Renault Clio 1998 vs Peugeot 206 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.9 | 1.1 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 110 HP | 60 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 - 160 NM | 94 - 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 15.4 seconds | 7.5 - 15.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 7.6 | 4.3 - 7.9 | |
|
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 206. On average, Renault Clio equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.77 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Clio is 5 cm shorter than the Peugeot 206, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 1070 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | 1130 litres | |
|
Peugeot 206 has more luggage space. Renault Clio has 815 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 206. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 206 (by 95 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.4 metres more than that of the Peugeot 206, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`498 | ~ 1`514 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |