Renault Clio 1998 vs Ford Fiesta 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.9 | 1.2 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 110 HP | 60 - 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 - 160 NM | 103 - 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 15.4 seconds | 10.2 - 17.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 7.6 | 5.3 - 7.3 | |
|
On average, the Renault Clio petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Ford Fiesta. On average, Renault Clio equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.77 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.63 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.32 m | |
| Renault Clio is 6 cm shorter than the Ford Fiesta, 1 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | 930 litres | |
| Renault Clio has 5 litres more trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 105 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Fiesta, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`498 | ~ 1`476 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |