Renault Clio 1998 vs Renault Clio 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.9 | 1.1 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 110 HP | 60 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 - 160 NM | 93 - 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 15.4 seconds | 9.6 - 15 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 7.6 | 4.2 - 7.4 | |
|
Renault Clio 1998 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio 2001. On average, Renault Clio 1998 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio 2001. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.77 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Clio 1998 is 4 cm shorter than the Renault Clio 2001, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Clio 2001 has more luggage space. Renault Clio 1998 has 255 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio 2001. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio 1998 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Renault Clio 2001. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`498 | ~ 1`495 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Renault Clio has
| |