Renault Clio 1998 vs Peugeot 106 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.9 | 1.0 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 110 HP | 50 - 118 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 - 160 NM | 74 - 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 15.4 seconds | 8.7 - 19.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 7.6 | 5.3 - 8.8 | |
|
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 106. On average, Renault Clio equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 106. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.77 m | 3.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.59 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Renault Clio is larger. Renault Clio is 9 cm longer than the Peugeot 106, 5 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | 953 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Renault Clio has 40 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 106. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 82 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.3 metres less than that of the Peugeot 106. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`498 | ~ 1`328 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
| |