Renault Clio 2001 vs Renault Clio 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.9 | 1.1 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 110 HP | 60 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 - 185 NM | 93 - 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 15 seconds | 9.6 - 15.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 7.4 | 5.2 - 7.6 | |
|
Renault Clio 2001 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio 1998. On average, Renault Clio 2001 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio 1998. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Clio 2001 is 4 cm longer than the Renault Clio 1998, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1035 litres | |
|
Renault Clio 2001 has more luggage capacity. Renault Clio 2001 has 255 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio 1998. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio 2001 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Clio 1998. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`495 | ~ 1`498 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Renault Clio has
| |