Renault Clio 2001 vs Dacia Logan 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
| Renault Clio is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Dacia Logan is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.9 | 1.1 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 110 HP | 70 - 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 - 185 NM | 107 - 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 15 seconds | 10.2 - 15 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 7.4 | 4.3 - 7.1 | |
|
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Dacia Logan. On average, Renault Clio equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 48 cm shorter than the Dacia Logan, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 510 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.2 metres more than that of the Dacia Logan. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`495 | ~ 1`548 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Dacia Logan has
| |