Renault Clio 2003 vs Ford Fiesta 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 110 HP | 68 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 - 200 NM | 106 - 204 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 15 seconds | 10.6 - 15.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 7.4 | 4.3 - 7.5 | |
|
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Fiesta. On average, Renault Clio equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 11 cm shorter than the Ford Fiesta, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 284 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1037 litres | 947 litres | |
| Renault Clio has 29 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 90 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.9 metres more than that of the Ford Fiesta, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`501 | ~ 1`540 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 5.0/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |