Renault Clio 2003 vs Renault Clio 2003

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Renault Clio
2003 - 2005
Renault Clio
2003 - 2005
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Renault Clio 2003 is available only with front wheel drive, while Renault Clio 2003 can be equipped with front wheel drive and rear wheel drive.
Engines: 1.1 - 1.61.1 - 2.9

Performance

Power: 60 - 110 HP60 - 255 HP
Torque: 93 - 200 NM93 - 300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.6 - 15 seconds5.8 - 15 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.2 - 7.44.2 - 11.9
Renault Clio 2003 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio 2003. On average, a Renault Clio 2003 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Renault Clio 2003.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.81 m3.81 m
Width: 1.64 m1.66 m
Height: 1.42 m1.42 m
Both cars are similar in size. Renault Clio 2003 and Renault Clio 2003 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 255 litres255 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1037 litres1037 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters13 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Clio 2003 is 2.3 metres less than that of the Renault Clio 2003, which means Renault Clio 2003 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`501~ 1`499
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

below average
Average price (€): 12001200
Rating in user reviews: 5.0/10 5.0/10
Pros and Cons: Renault Clio has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Renault Clio has
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv