Renault Clio 2003 vs Fiat Punto 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 110 HP | 60 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 - 200 NM | 102 - 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 15 seconds | 9.6 - 14.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 7.4 | 4.5 - 6.5 | |
|
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Fiat Punto. On average, Renault Clio equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Punto. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 5 cm shorter than the Fiat Punto, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 297 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1037 litres | 1080 litres | |
|
Fiat Punto has more luggage space. Renault Clio has 42 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Punto. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Fiat Punto (by 43 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.2 metres more than that of the Fiat Punto. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`501 | ~ 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Fiat Punto has
| |