Renault Clio 2008 vs Skoda Fabia 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 128 HP | 60 - 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 - 220 NM | 108 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 13.4 seconds | 7.3 - 16.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 7.5 | 3.8 - 7.5 | |
|
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Fabia. On average, Renault Clio equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Renault Clio is larger, but slightly lower. Renault Clio is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 315 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Renault Clio has 27 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. This could mean that the Renault Clio uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.2 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`628 | ~ 1`626 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |