Renault Clio 2008 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | 1.1 - 1.5 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 128 HP | 75 - 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 - 220 NM | 100 - 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 13.4 seconds | 10 - 13.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 7.5 | 5.5 - 6.2 | |
|
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Colt. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 3.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Renault Clio is larger, but lower. Renault Clio is 9 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 1 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1032 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Renault Clio has 68 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`628 | ~ 1`457 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |