Renault Captur 2012 vs Nissan Juke 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is a more dynamic driving. Renault Captur engine produces 20 HP less power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Nissan Juke. Due to the lower power, Renault Captur reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.7 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Captur is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Captur consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that by driving the Renault Captur over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Captur consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1210 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1320 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Captur gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Captur is 1 cm shorter than the Nissan Juke, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1235 litres | 830 litres | |
|
Renault Captur has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Captur has 126 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Juke. The Nissan Juke may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Captur (by 405 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`749 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Captur scores higher in safety tests. The Renault Captur scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Renault Captur has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Renault Captur, so Renault Captur quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Captur has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |