Renault Captur 2012 vs Renault Scenic 2012
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is a more dynamic driving. Renault Captur engine produces 20 HP less power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Renault Scenic. Due to the lower power, Renault Captur reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.7 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Captur is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Captur consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that by driving the Renault Captur over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Captur consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1210 km in combined cycle | 1460 km in combined cycle | |
| 1320 km on highway | 1530 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Renault Captur is smaller. Renault Captur is 24 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Captur is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1235 litres | 1870 litres | |
|
Renault Scenic has more luggage space. Renault Captur has 93 litres less trunk space than the Renault Scenic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 635 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Captur is 0.6 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic, which means Renault Captur can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`749 | 1`967 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Renault Captur scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Renault Captur has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Renault Captur, so Renault Captur quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Captur has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |