Renault Captur 2012 vs Nissan Qashqai 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is a more dynamic driving. Renault Captur engine produces 13 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Nissan Qashqai. Due to the lower power, Renault Captur reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.7 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Captur is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Captur consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Renault Captur over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Captur consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1210 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1320 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 1100 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 201 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Qashqai can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan Qashqai version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from five 4x4 versions of Nissan Qashqai 2010 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Renault Captur is smaller. Renault Captur is 21 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Captur is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1235 litres | 1513 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Renault Captur has 33 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 278 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Captur is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`749 | 1`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Renault Captur has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 225 percent more cases than Renault Captur, so Renault Captur quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Captur has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |